Double Standards: Carter’s Kindest Media Eulogists Were Rough on Reagan

In all the somber coverage of Jimmy Carter’s death, the audience could and should expect the tone of kindness that wafts over wakes and funerals.... Read More The post Double Standards: Carter’s Kindest Media Eulogists Were Rough on Reagan appeared first on T…
Ernie Stanton · 2 days ago · 2 minutes read


Remembering Jimmy Carter: A Tale of Perspectives

Media Coverage: A Mix of Kindness and Critique

The passing of Jimmy Carter brought forth heartfelt tributes, acknowledging his service and legacy. However, amidst the somberness, some media outlets struck a more critical tone.

CBS's Lesley Stahl extolled Carter's accomplishments, claiming he "ended up accomplishing so much more than we realized," despite his unpopularity at the time.

"He turns out not to have been a weak president at all."

Contrasting Coverage: The Reagan Legacy

In contrast to Carter's portrayal, the media's coverage of Ronald Reagan's death was initially more positive or nuanced.

However, the Democrat "itch" surfaced in comments questioning the legacy of "Reaganomics." CNN's Sam Donaldson accused Reagan of causing the budget deficit and cutting social programs for the vulnerable.

AP reporter, Beth Fouhy, attributed a surge in poverty and homelessness to Reagan's tax cuts and reduced welfare benefits.

The Carter Enigma

Carter's initial AP coverage reflected a sense of his uniqueness and impact, highlighting his intellectual abilities, religious faith, and work ethic.

However, some journalists maintain that Carter's legacy is often misunderstood or misrepresented in retrospect.

Political Implications

The media's handling of Carter's legacy serves as a reminder of the political implications of historical narratives.

Carter's defeat due to misfortunes like inflation and foreign crises offers parallels to President Biden's own challenges, suggesting that the wounds of domestic ineptitude and global weakness still linger within the Democratic Party.